Instagram is testing a long-form video product called Features, aimed squarely at podcasters, comedians and other longform creators, and its core bet is a single click: a viewer watching a short Reel can jump straight into the full-length video. That integrated path from short-form discovery to long-form consumption is the product's main strategic distinction from YouTube, the incumbent it is chasing. But there is a catch for anyone planning a business around it: Instagram's monetization terms are not public, while YouTube offers qualified creators a known 55 percent ad revenue share. Here is what the test, reported by The Hollywood Reporter on October 26, 2026, actually tells us.
Instagram's New "Features": A Game Changer for Long-Form?
The product is aimed at podcasters, comedians and other longform creators, according to reporting by Caitlin Huston in The Hollywood Reporter. The headline innovation is the link between formats: creators can connect their Reels—typically around three minutes or less—to their overall Feature, so a viewer who sees a clip can continue into the whole video. Tessa Lyons, vice president of product at Instagram, described the intended flow: "you see a clip of a podcast that you love, you can just click and continue watching or watch the full video, and you'll be able to dive in and see the whole thing because creators are going to be able to link these Reels to their overall feature."
That framing matters because it positions Instagram not as a new long-form host competing on catalog depth, but as a platform where the discovery layer and the destination are the same app. The context for the move is competitive: Netflix, Disney and others have been adding podcasts and creator videos to capture viewing hours and compete with YouTube. Instagram is entering that same contest, with the advantage of an existing short-form habit among its users. The feature is currently in testing, so its final form and terms may change.
The Instagram Content Funnel: From Reels to "Features"
The practical workflow the product enables is a classic content funnel, compressed into one platform. A creator posts a short clip as a Reel—say, the sharpest three minutes of a podcast episode. A viewer who enjoys it no longer has to leave the app or search elsewhere; the Reel links directly to the full Feature, converting casual discovery into deep consumption.
This matches a widely described pattern in video strategy: short-form content draws viewers in, previews larger work and expands an audience quickly, while long-form content builds authority and deeper connection. Life Inside, writing on short-form versus long-form video strategy, notes that long videos can also be broken into shorter segments for social promotion that drives viewers back to the full length. Instagram's Features essentially productizes that loop: the clip is the ad, and the Feature is the destination, with no handoff to another platform where the viewer might drop off.
YouTube's Established Long-Form Ecosystem
YouTube remains the reference point for long-form video, and its dominance in that category is well established. Its short-form layer, YouTube Shorts, also functions as a discovery tool with a route into long-form viewing—Debra Garber, writing on dlvr.it, lists "long-form integration" as a capability of YouTube Shorts that TikTok and Instagram Reels lack in her comparison. That integration, though, can operate with varying degrees of directness depending on how a creator structures it, and the evidence here does not establish that Shorts-to-long-form transitions are as seamless as the Reel-to-Feature link Instagram describes.
For a podcaster or creator, the practical difference is this: on YouTube, long-form is the native center of gravity, supported by search and evergreen discovery. On Instagram, long-form is the new arrival, bolted onto an audience that arrived for short, social scrolling. Whether that audience converts into sustained long-form watch time is exactly what this test is designed to find out.
Monetization: Instagram's Deals vs. YouTube's Revenue Share
This is where the comparison becomes lopsided, at least for now. YouTube offers qualified creators 55 percent of ad revenue and helps generate brand deals, a publicly known and established model. Instagram has nothing equivalent to point to for Features. Lyons said Instagram is currently working on "a few different deals" with the early creators for the product, but the specific terms are not public and may vary from creator to creator.
Two details from the reporting are worth noting for anyone weighing an offer. First, there is currently no exclusivity requirement around putting the videos on Instagram—unlike Netflix's deals for podcasts—so early participants are not locked in. Second, because monetization runs through individual deal-making rather than a published revenue share, your leverage depends on your existing audience and your willingness to negotiate. That makes Features a very different proposition from YouTube's standardized, transparent split.
Instagram Features vs. YouTube: A Strategic Comparison for Creators
The table below compares the two platforms across the dimensions that should drive your choice: how audiences move from discovery to full-length viewing, what monetization is actually known, and which creator profile each suits.
| Dimension | Instagram "Features" | YouTube |
|---|---|---|
| Platform status | New long-form product currently in testing | Established long-form platform with broad reach |
| Content funnel (discovery to consumption) | Reels link directly to the full Feature; viewer clicks from a short clip into the whole video | Shorts serve as a discovery tool into long-form, with integration that can vary in directness |
| Monetization (known details) | Individual deals with early creators; terms not publicly disclosed; no exclusivity currently required | 55 percent ad revenue share for qualified creators, plus support for brand deals |
| Best for... | Creators with a short-form audience who want an integrated path to deeper engagement and can negotiate deals directly | Creators seeking predictable, transparent ad revenue on an established long-form platform |
Read the verdict row carefully, because it is a strategic assessment, not a tested outcome. The evidence supports a clear division: if you already post Reels and want your existing viewers to go deeper without leaving the app, Features offers a mechanism YouTube's evidence does not show as directly. If you need dependable, published revenue terms today, YouTube's 55 percent share is the only concrete number on the table.
Making Your Move: Instagram or YouTube for Long-Form Video?
Creators should evaluate Instagram's Features product as a complementary or primary platform based on their existing short-form audience and willingness to engage in direct deal-making for monetization, while YouTube remains the established choice for direct ad revenue. The two are not mutually exclusive: since Instagram is not currently requiring exclusivity, an early Features deal can sit alongside your YouTube channel rather than replace it.
For podcasters especially, the sensible posture is opportunistic. If Instagram approaches you with a deal, the absence of exclusivity means the downside is limited; the upside is a discovery funnel your competitors may not have yet. If you are starting from zero, YouTube's transparent revenue model and established long-form audience remain the safer foundation. Monitor official Instagram announcements for public monetization terms and broader rollout details of Features—that is the milestone that will turn this test into a real platform decision.
Sources
- Instagram Tests 90-Minute Horizontal Videos in Major Play for Podcasters and Creators — The Hollywood Reporter
- Short-Form vs Long-Form Video: Which Wins in 2026? — Life Inside
- TikTok vs. Instagram Reels vs. YouTube Shorts — dlvr.it | blog




